Support |
On 04-04-12 03.44, "Neil T. Loehlein" <shattered_galaxy@hotmail.com> wrote: > i'm sorry, my question may have been misinterpreted. i need to know >whether > it is possible to throw the initial loop in reverse, keeping it in >reverse the > whole while reverse overdubs are placed over it. I need to know if the > direction of the loop and consecutive overdubs is independent. what i >don't > want to have to do is keep switching the loop forward and reverse in a >live > performance in order to get the loop and all it's overdubs in reverse >fashion. > (example: throw loop in reverse--without changing direction of loop at >all, > lay overdubs in reverse in top of initial loop) does this clarify? > thanks, > neil > You seem to already know it! :-) The echoplex is a mono looper and if you want one layer of a loop to be reversed, related to earlier layers, you will have to first reverse the loop before recording the new layer and then reverse it back again. It seems to me that a Repeater can meet your expectations better. (I personally like the EDP better, but that's just my way of using it in my own music) Best wishes Per Boysen -- www.boysen.se www.looproom.com