Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
This sounds interesting. Personally, I have found using the EDP, on a practical level, very difficult, because I don't fully understand a lot of the definitions used in the manual. It's not that the manual is bad, its just my inability to get my head around what's being discussed. I wish I could understand it in such a way so that if I hear something in my head that I could accomplish with the EDP, I know how to define it so I can actually create it. What I would find helpful, if at all possible, is someone creating a step by step how to, with audio examples, for some of the fundamental workings of the EDP. This start with just a basic function and then gradually build on. I feel a tutorial like this would at least provide me a foundation that I can build on using the manual and my own experimentation. Steve >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Luca Bonvini" <lucabonvini@free.fr> >To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> >Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 10:03 AM >Subject: EDP Manual Organization was: The echoplex manual s......Re: The >Echoplex Manual Sucks and the Guy That Wrote It Is an Idiot > > >> Hello from a beginner EDP to the other beginners, >> >> To learn faster the EDP I went around the two manuals (Echoplex and Loop >> IV....I'm not sure an unified one exist yet). Tired of the process of >> updating myself from one manual to the other I copied them section by >> section to a file on a word processor. I have ordered the entries by >> button (Record, Overdub etc...and not in alphabetical order) and >> inserted the LoopIV upgrades paragraphs related at the end of every >> single button of the echoplex part. I did this first part only >> considering Moreloop=1 and then I'll have to go through the second part >> that begins when moreloops is different than 1 (and I'm aware that this >> will be something...). I'm still editing: reading in this sequence >> seems evident that few parts of echoplex manual seems no more actually >> valid and may be erased from my text. Sometimes a specification >> (Quantize=on or Quantize=off and may be more) need to be added as a >> reminder because at some points in the Echoplex manual this is specified >> only in the Figures and not in the text. I can go through my own manual >> methodically starting with the different parameters of every button and >> the different alternate ending, trying practically all the steps and >> alternate steps....etc...it seems to flow and I can keep it...looping >> until I get it, besides playing for fun trying to make work in real time >> the already assimilated hints... >> >> This I did only with the hope to digest earlier and more orderly and >> completely the functionality of this amazing loop processor and it seem >> to become more clear fast. The original manuals seems very good >> considering the amount of material they have to deal with. >> >> When is ready I can share it with whoever need it and think he cannot do >> it by himself. >> >> Feedback 100%, please, >> >> Best Regards, Luca >> >> BTW: Changing the length of the loop using Record as alternate ending of >> Multiply with quantize off works as described but, as I was trying to do >> it with quantize on in the beginning I noticed that sometimes ending >> multiply with a longer press of record (Quantize=on) also redefine the >> loop length seemingly at the release of the record. Is it possible? >> >> > > >