Support |
> At 1:46 PM -0800 12/2/04, Tim Nelson wrote: >> --- a k butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: >> in response to Richard Zvonar's assertion that: >>>> The most obvious application is in multichannel >>> surround, where the flocking is spatial. >>> >>> not obvious if you don't have 6(or more) speakers >> >> I caught Dr. Zvonar's piece "Fricket" at the Ought-1 >> festival three years ago; he had the sounds of frogs >> and crickets in octophonic (I think it was) surround! > > That was indeed 8-channel, with the speakers in an equally-spaced > octagonal configuration. I made the piece specifically for that > situation - it was inspired by Larry Austin's restoration of Cage's > "Williams Mix" (the first 8-channel piece) and by Larry's own > "Williams [re]Mix[ed]." It was fun to present all three pieces > back-to-back, with Larry and I telling the stories of the pieces' > genesis. > > "Frikkit!" was made in a fairly simple manner, with no dynamic > spatialization at all. I used unaltered cricket and frog sounds and > arranged them statically in space. Any movement that was perceived > was either inherent in the source recordings or was a result of the > "call and response" between sounds in different channels. this mutiple speaker setup reminds me of my trip to this place w/ 169(!) speakers in place-we went in w/ minds wide open but left @ intermission cause...well, in the words of g.harrison its "<all too much>" stan http://www.audium.org/