Support |
Better yet, PSP84. I like that versi0n much more than PSP42..much more powerful, but also processing intensive. PSP84 is laced through most all my live recordings in the last 8 months. You do mean the current VST plugins, right? Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Per Boysen" <per@boysen.se> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:58 AM Subject: Re: Mobius on the Receptor (was Repeater-- Speculation and disinformation) Don't you thing the Lexicon PSP42 would be cool with the Receptor? Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.looproom.com (international) www.boysen.se (Swedish) ---> iTunes Music Store (digital) www.cdbaby.com/perboysen On Oct 14, 2005, at 4:43, Kelly Coyle wrote: > Will do. A guy can dream... > > Loopy Llama does run. It's more of a JamMan style looper than an > EDP style looper. That's my fallback option. I'm really hoping for > Mobius, of course. There's also lots of Fripp-inspired tape delay > simulations, FWIW, and a lot of the more complicated delays have > loop-like options (see OhmBoyz). One downside is that the Receptor > has the Worlds Most Stupid MIDI ImplementationŠ. They're supposed > to fix that, to some extent, in the next software revision. I want > the Receptor regardless of Mobius, but it would be killer with it. > > > On Oct 13, 2005, at 9:20 PM, Jeff Larson wrote: > > >> Kelly Coyle wrote: >> >> >>> Hey, since I'm here, I'm awaiting a Receptor. I'm eager to see >>> if Mobius will run on it. Loopy Llama does, anyway, along with a >>> lot of pretty cool delays. I'll post if it does (or not) when I >>> can test it (once I get it). >>> >>> >> >> Sorry to disappoint you but I'm fairly certain Mobius will not run >> on a Receptor. Mobius was originally designed as a standalone >> application and as such it is not a "pure" VST plugin. In particular >> it does not use VSTGUI, a popular cross-platform user interface >> toolkit >> that a lot of plugins use. Some of the synchronization features also >> require that it make direct contact with Windows MIDI devices >> which is >> not allowed in portable VSTs. >> >> Unless they've done a spectacular job on their Windows emulator >> (Receptor internally runs Linux) I doubt it will work. If you >> get any diagnostic messages with details about what Receptor didn't >> like I'd like to see them. >> >> Jeff