Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Can someone please answer this? Thanks >From: "mrweasel" <mrweasel@eircom.net> >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> >Subject: RE: Looperlative - Max Time? >Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:52:30 -0000 > >If you loop over the same track several times (overdubbing), does it >decrease the available looping time or is it? >Say if I have a 20sec loop on which I overdub 10 times, will I have as >much >looping time after the tenth loop or will my available time decrease after >each overdub? > >Someone was saying the Looperlative doesn't store loops. Is that right? Is >the memory volatile? > > _____ > >From: monk [mailto:monk@fuse.net] >Sent: 29 January 2006 20:37 >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >Subject: Re: Looperlative - Max Time? > > >i can actually imagine a scenario where one might get close. there have >been >pieces of music that i have been unable to do with either the EDP or the >repeater (although with the repeater, it has been "technically" possible, >it >just never worked in practice to make very long-ish -4plus minute loops.) > > >my guess is that the looperlative will handle this with grace. > >i have often wanted to play a three voice bach fugue with a looping device >and have gotten close on some smaller chorales with the repeater. > > >i could imagine using all eight tracks (stereo) and wanting more than a >minute each. but be not deceived, i will pony up for the looperative when >the time comes. > > > >has anyone looked at the midi spec for the L? i looked on the website and >didn't see anything about whether it will answer to sys-ex or even CC.. >but >maybe i missed it. > > >r. > > > > > >On Jan 27, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Bob Amstadt wrote: > > >The beast is equipped with 128 Mbytes. > >With a 24bit/48khz sampling, this gives > >- about 932 seconds mono > >- or 466 sec stereo > >- or 58 sec per stereo track if you use all the 8. > > > >monk@fuse.net > >www.richordinski.com > >www.myspace.com/richordinskimusic >