Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: MaxMSP looping -



I've been admiring max from a distance. I'm glad you pointed out the
usefulness of max in a purely graphical sense (building apps in the
graphical environment).

I have a question. Is max practical for developing a looper app that has
midi sync capability? That is, locking or generating to midi clock and
establishing loop times that stay in sync with external percussion devices.

On a similar note, what do you see for performance and latency of the apps
you write. Any success with low latency and performance when using the max
vst wrappers?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kaiser [mailto:loopersdelight@pfmentum.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 2:20 PM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: MaxMSP looping -

Oh yeah, absolutely understood. Just reinforcing.

The idea of it as a programming language kept me from jumping to max 
for years, since it came out. I was intimidated by that, and it turns 
out mistakenly so. Then I got very tired of carrying around 140+ pounds 
of gear and cables. the train in london last august was the final 
straw. So I guess I have the currently avowedly non-laptop performer 
Steve Lawson to thank for moving me to laptop. (He does stuff with 
laptop at his house, though, I think.)....down to 43 pounds for the 
festival in Boise, and 20 of that is the case.  My goal is to get it 
down to a laptop case and trumpet case....

Jeff

(sitting down right now with a pot of tea and max....)



Jeff Kaiser
http://www.jeffkaisermusic.com
pfMENTUM.com . AngryVegan.com


On May 5, 2006, at 11:00 AM, cpr@musetrap.com wrote:

> I didn't mean to focus on that aspect, I only wanted to point out that 
> the more
> complex ideas require more of an understanding at that level... that's 
> why I
> pointed out the simplistic route as well... because of that, the exact 
> dynamic
> you describe happens.. :) at a basic level, it's just like plugging 
> cables
> between fx boxes, and tweaking the parameters...
>
> peace