Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Hey, I'm thinking of staying with my Repeater and ditching the Looperlative. Bob's offered to take it back but I imagine he'll just sell it for his $1500 price. I'm not looking to make money on this, but I'd like to retreive my full purchase amount. $1320 gets it shipped to your door if you're in the USA. M --- mark t <aleatoric12@gmail.com> wrote: > If you want to sell your LP1 i'll take it! > > On 5/2/06, mark sottilaro > <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > > --- Claude Voit <c.voit@vtx.ch> wrote: > > > > > having followed the LP1 forum for a while, I'm a > > > little bothered with the > > > "throw in your ideas, boys" way of develloping a > > > software. > > > > Boy howdy, Claude!! At first I thought, "what a > great > > idea, go to the people!" and then reality set in. > > People are self absorbed jerks! I'm a self > absorbed > > jerk! I'm shocked that Bob's not gone crazy by > this > > point. I can't wait for the "let's change the > logo > > thread!" ;) > > > > I can't help but feel that in some ways, maybe due > to > > his design by customer input, that I bought a beta > > product. The manual is poor (many features are > barely > > mentioned, let alone explained, if it wasn't for > Steve > > Lawson on the forum I probably would have returned > the > > LP-1), it's got outputs that aren't implemented in > any > > way and did ship with a fair amount of bugs. (many > > have already been found and fixed) Was a night of > my > > life wasted because v 1.1 refered to midi channels > as > > 0-15? Yes it was. Another gone because the midi > > clock sync didn't work? Yeah, that too. Another > gone > > because stopped tracks don't restart synced to the > > clock... > > > > Also, because of it's very open yet unfinished > form > > I'm one of those frustrated owners. It's a tweak > away > > from being my dream looper. (there's curently no > way > > to use the midi tracks as separate loops when > synced > > to a midi clock and have them operate like the EDP > or > > the Repeater does, toggling betwen them) Judging > from > > what I read on the forum you could operate it that > > way. > > > > If this was a product from a company like Roland > or > > Digitech, it would have been returned. Mostly > when > > those companies release a product it is what it > is. > > I'd have said, "Oh, this product does't operate > like I > > want it to. Bye bye." But now I have a product > that > > *may* change into what I want. This is kind of > odd, > > as rather than digging into if for what it is (a > very > > cool multi track looper), I can't help but think > of > > what it isn't and might be. LOOP TEASE! > > > > Will my tweak come? I don't know. I've put in > > several requests but never got a "oh that's slated > in > > the next release" or "no, that's not doable at > this > > time" reply. The reply was "When it comes to > multiple > > tracks, especially when combined with MIDI sync, > we > > will need to spend more time defining how you want > the > > software to work. The software is still young and > I'd > > be happy to make changes to make operate in a > useable > > fashion." How much time? Do I be patient? I > don't > > develop hardware/software loopers so I have no > idea > > what it takes in terms of time to implement > features. > > Maybe my request isn't worth Bob's time as I'm one > of > > few that even care about this. > > > > As it stands now it's mostly useless to me *but I > > couldn't know that based on prerelease > information* > > It's not even in my signal chain. I know I'm > ranting > > (I'm a good ranter, eh?) but $1200 left my bank > acount > > on something that's sitting on a shelf. Do I > wait? > > How long? Bob has been amazing and patient, but > part > > of me wishs that a bit more time was spent in > initial > > conception before it was released. If I knew that > > this *is* the way the LP-1 is going to be for a > long > > time, I would have passed. > > > > I'm not saying the LP-1 isn't GREAT. It is a > great > > looper. In some ways it's the best. If you're > not a > > midi clock looper, this may indeed be your box. > If > > you don't care about cuing a new loop to start > > recording at the end of the current loop AND then > > going back and finding the first loop still > perfectly > > synced to your drum machine, this may be your > looper. > > If you want 8 stereo channels of midi synced (or > not) > > loops that don't all have to be the same length, > this > > may be your looper. > > > > Of course Bob is on this list so he's probably > going > > to read this. Hi Bob! Bob, I like you. I like > the > > Looperlative. I could not have done anything like > > this at all. I have much respect for your hard > work > > and effort. Your ability to implement all our > crazy > > feature requests in a short time has been amazing. > > I'd have told me to fuck off a long time ago. In > a > > sense I wish you would. Then I could say, "is the > > LP-1 worth owning in it's current form?" and be > done > > with it. Like it is it's an itch in my brain that > I > > just can't scratch. > > > > Mark > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com