Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Oops, disregard. It was meant to go to Mark T... --- mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hey, > > I'm thinking of staying with my Repeater and > ditching > the Looperlative. Bob's offered to take it back but > I > imagine he'll just sell it for his $1500 price. I'm > not looking to make money on this, but I'd like to > retreive my full purchase amount. $1320 gets it > shipped to your door if you're in the USA. > > M > > --- mark t <aleatoric12@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If you want to sell your LP1 i'll take it! > > > > On 5/2/06, mark sottilaro > > <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > --- Claude Voit <c.voit@vtx.ch> wrote: > > > > > > > having followed the LP1 forum for a while, I'm > a > > > > little bothered with the > > > > "throw in your ideas, boys" way of develloping > a > > > > software. > > > > > > Boy howdy, Claude!! At first I thought, "what a > > great > > > idea, go to the people!" and then reality set > in. > > > People are self absorbed jerks! I'm a self > > absorbed > > > jerk! I'm shocked that Bob's not gone crazy by > > this > > > point. I can't wait for the "let's change the > > logo > > > thread!" ;) > > > > > > I can't help but feel that in some ways, maybe > due > > to > > > his design by customer input, that I bought a > beta > > > product. The manual is poor (many features are > > barely > > > mentioned, let alone explained, if it wasn't for > > Steve > > > Lawson on the forum I probably would have > returned > > the > > > LP-1), it's got outputs that aren't implemented > in > > any > > > way and did ship with a fair amount of bugs. > (many > > > have already been found and fixed) Was a night > of > > my > > > life wasted because v 1.1 refered to midi > channels > > as > > > 0-15? Yes it was. Another gone because the > midi > > > clock sync didn't work? Yeah, that too. > Another > > gone > > > because stopped tracks don't restart synced to > the > > > clock... > > > > > > Also, because of it's very open yet unfinished > > form > > > I'm one of those frustrated owners. It's a > tweak > > away > > > from being my dream looper. (there's curently no > > way > > > to use the midi tracks as separate loops when > > synced > > > to a midi clock and have them operate like the > EDP > > or > > > the Repeater does, toggling betwen them) Judging > > from > > > what I read on the forum you could operate it > that > > > way. > > > > > > If this was a product from a company like Roland > > or > > > Digitech, it would have been returned. Mostly > > when > > > those companies release a product it is what it > > is. > > > I'd have said, "Oh, this product does't operate > > like I > > > want it to. Bye bye." But now I have a product > > that > > > *may* change into what I want. This is kind of > > odd, > > > as rather than digging into if for what it is (a > > very > > > cool multi track looper), I can't help but think > > of > > > what it isn't and might be. LOOP TEASE! > > > > > > Will my tweak come? I don't know. I've put in > > > several requests but never got a "oh that's > slated > > in > > > the next release" or "no, that's not doable at > > this > > > time" reply. The reply was "When it comes to > > multiple > > > tracks, especially when combined with MIDI sync, > > we > > > will need to spend more time defining how you > want > > the > > > software to work. The software is still young > and > > I'd > > > be happy to make changes to make operate in a > > useable > > > fashion." How much time? Do I be patient? I > > don't > > > develop hardware/software loopers so I have no > > idea > > > what it takes in terms of time to implement > > features. > > > Maybe my request isn't worth Bob's time as I'm > one > > of > > > few that even care about this. > > > > > > As it stands now it's mostly useless to me *but > I > > > couldn't know that based on prerelease > > information* > > > It's not even in my signal chain. I know I'm > > ranting > > > (I'm a good ranter, eh?) but $1200 left my bank > > acount > > > on something that's sitting on a shelf. Do I > > wait? > > > How long? Bob has been amazing and patient, but > > part > > > of me wishs that a bit more time was spent in > > initial > > > conception before it was released. If I knew > that > > > this *is* the way the LP-1 is going to be for a > > long > > > time, I would have passed. > > > > > > I'm not saying the LP-1 isn't GREAT. It is a > > great > > > looper. In some ways it's the best. If you're > > not a > > > midi clock looper, this may indeed be your box. > > If > > > you don't care about cuing a new loop to start > > > recording at the end of the current loop AND > then > > > going back and finding the first loop still > > perfectly > > > synced to your drum machine, this may be your > > looper. > > > If you want 8 stereo channels of midi synced (or > > not) > > > loops that don't all have to be the same length, > > this > > > may be your looper. > > > > > > Of course Bob is on this list so he's probably > > going > > > to read this. Hi Bob! Bob, I like you. I like > > the > > > Looperlative. I could not have done anything > like > > > this at all. I have much respect for your hard > > work > > > and effort. Your ability to implement all our > > crazy > > > feature requests in a short time has been > amazing. > > > I'd have told me to fuck off a long time ago. > In > > a > > > sense I wish you would. Then I could say, "is > the > > > LP-1 worth owning in it's current form?" and be > > done > > > with it. Like it is it's an itch in my brain > that > > I > > > just can't scratch. > > > > > > Mark > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com