Re: Staying on the Looping topic

[mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>]

What's embarassing is that I only made number 2 on the
list?  DAMN YOU KRISPEN! <shakes fist> I'LL GET YOU!

Frankly I eagerly await each of your posts and read
them all.  Often saving them to a special folder for
later reexamination.  Let's face it, there's not all
that much to talk about when it comes to looping.  Why
not talk about what effects to use on your loops or
what to put in your loops?  Keep up the good work.  I
love this list.  I'd rather it be a bit OT heavy than
the normal drivel that's out there on most groups. 
WOOT LOL

--- Krispen Hartung <khartung@cableone.net> wrote:

> And here is 111, for cripes sake. What a number to
> resonate on, eh? Sorry 
> folks, I'm a power communicator. I'll shut up for a
> while, but hopefully the 
> stuff I post isn't pure drivel.
> 
> ...man, that is embarassing.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin" <kevin@TheNettles.com>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Staying on the Looping topic
> 
> 
> > At 06:53 PM 7/26/2006, Kim Flint wrote:
> >>Some individuals post constantly, yet almost never
> post about looping at 
> >>all.
> >
> > I took off my music geek hat and put on my
> computer geek hat and wrote the 
> > following program in Cygwin:
> > $ awk '/^From:/ {from[$0]++}
> > END {for (person in from)
> > print from[person] " " person}' julyld.txt | sort
> -nr
> >
> > From this program here are the posters who emailed
> Looper's Delight 10 or 
> > more times in July in descending order.  The first
> number is the number of 
> > times they posted this month based on the raw
> archive:
> >
> > 110 From: "Krispen Hartung"
> <khartung@cableone.net>
> > 39 From: mark sottilaro
> <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>
> > 39 From: "Buzap Buzap" <buzap@gmx.net>
> > 37 From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>
> > 31 From: "L.A. Angulo" <labaloops@yahoo.com>
> > 26 From: Joshua Carroll <josh@infinivert.com>
> > 25 From: "Timothy Mungenast"
> <mungenast@earthlink.net>
> > 21 From: mech <mech@m3ch.net>
> > 19 From: goddard.duncan@mtvne.com
> > 18 From: "Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill"
> <rs@moinlabs.de>
> > 17 From: Daryl Shawn <highhorse@mhorse.com>
> > 16 From: Jeff Kaiser <loopersdelight@pfmentum.com>
> > 16 From: "mark t" <aleatoric12@gmail.com>
> > 15 From: a k butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>
> > 13 From: rune fagereng <rune_fagereng@yahoo.no>
> > 13 From: daniel stevenson <stillllscary@yahoo.com>
> > 13 From: Kim Flint <kflint@loopers-delight.com>
> > 13 From: "Gary Lehmann" <hqr@cox.net>
> > 12 From: Jeffrey Larson <jeff@zonemobius.com>
> > 12 From: Bill Fox <billyfox@soundscapes.us>
> > 12 From: "loop.pool" <looppool@cruzio.com>
> > 11 From: johnsrude@peak.org
> > 11 From: Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net>
> > 11 From: "Charlie Milkey" <pilotcp@gmail.com>
> > 10 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?tEd_=AE_kiLLiAn?=
> <tedkillian@charter.net>
> >
> > What's my point?  The first point depends on
> whether you think frequent 
> > posting is a good thing or bad thing--it also
> depends on whether you think 
> > the top ten folks post about looping or not.  The
> second point is how 
> > ridiculously easy it is for spammers to harvest
> email addresses from the 
> > LD archives.  The third point is that data is
> always good. ;-)
> >
> > Peace,
> > Kevin
> >
> > The Nettles: Progressive and Exciting Celtic Music
> > www.TheNettles.com
> > Email: Kevin@TheNettles.com
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com