Support |
Oops, my bad I meant to say scamble. There are three scramble mode speeds, and I can't really answer your question as I haven't tried slaving or clocking via midi with the LP-1 yet. I personally have been moving away from performing with a bunch of midi stuff all clocked together, but I will be running some tests in the next few weeks to check out the LP-1 with my roland drum machine. Thanks Bill -----Original Message----- From: Daryl Shawn [mailto:highhorse@mhorse.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 11:57 AM To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: Re: Bill Walker using Looperlative recording available for download thanks, Bill, fascinating stuff. Just one question - is the "shuffle" mode the same as the "scramble" mode you mention below? Also, is it possible to sync the rate of the shuffle, or control it via MIDI? I'm a long way away from doing anything with sync (or MIDI for that matter), but I'm curious, it seems like it'd be especially useful if that were possible. Daryl Shawn www.swanwelder.com > Hey thanks for the kind words, my Peeps. The improvisation you heard was > done in real time, without edits or pre-records. I started by creating a > simple rubato melodic theme, I then changed the record speed to half >speed > which dropped the loop down an octave and then I reversed the track. then I > applied the fast shuffle mode to the loop which created the sequenced > sounding bass part. Subsequent tracks I added where mostly of an ambient > nature, but I continued to make liberal use of the different record speeds, > reverse function, replace function and the shuffle mode, not to mention > bringing tracks in and out via expression controlled volume fades. in > addition to the LP-1, I used a DL-4 for the auto-volume effect, a Seymour > Duncan twin tube for overdrive effects, and a vox tonelab for amp sounds and > some secondary delay effects. I believe I had 4 or 5 independent tracks > going by the end. Major Kudos to Steve Lawson who suggested the scramble > function to Bob, which I used in a pretty inside way, but has great > potential for glitchy weirdness, and most major kudos for Bob, for > continuing to come up with new features for this remarkable tool. For >guys > like me who are not ready to commit to a software solution, this is as good > as it gets. > > Thanks, > Bill >