Support |
yeah, but are you getting a click or metronome from ableton? On Jan 22, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Zoe Keating wrote: > ok, FINALLY i am in one place long enough to write this email. i'm > in london, where it is COLD. > > i think fabio asked how i am looping 12 tracks with minimal foot > swtiching. > > so... > > dummy clips in ableton live > > the setup goes like this: > > - my foot taps a button on the FCB1010 > - the FCB1010 sends PC messages to Ableton > - PC messages launch clips or scenes or a sequence of clips > - some of the clips are midi clips containing notes > - midi notes are translated in midipipe and sent back to Repeater1, > Repeater2, and Ableton* > - these midi clips work like sequencers, sending batches of timed > commands to the Repeaters (record, stop record, next track, record, > pan, mute, etc) > - some of the clips are blank audio clips > - the blank audio clips contain envelope information for the audio > coming in from Repeater1 and Repeater2 (like an automated mixer. > for example to fade out the audio of a Repeater) > > Sounds complicated, but its actually very simple. whereas before > every button of the FCB1010 controlled a single function of a > Repeater, now i have a button to do the batches of things I tend to > do, but i only have to press the button once. > > Snags: > > - Repeaters can't deal with midi messages fired at them in close > succession. i have to space things out so no messages are sent > simultaneously, however, with clever spacing of the sequenced > events, it "seems" simultaneous. > - I think it might be my midi interfaces (emagic) but sometimes > notes are dropped. i can still "take control" of the repeater at > any time when an error occurs though by using the same old banks I > always used on the FCB1010. > > anyway, that's the long and short of it. its been pretty > revolutionary for me because i can spend more time playing the > cello and less time worrying about hitting the right sequence of > footswitches. > > my time is about to run out on this internet access (so expensive > over here!!) or i would write more. > ask questions if you have them. > > > > *Note about Abletone: my intention was to use the Looperlative for > the extra 4 loops, but I had some difficulties using the unit and > found it quicker to program Ableton. also, since i have to travel > pretty far and wanted all my gear to fit in a 5 space rack, i > decided to lose the Looperlative and use the computer (have my motu > and power supply in the 5th space). this is not to say i won't use > the Looperlative later, i just ran out of time and had to move on > to a tool i was more familiar with. >