Heck, I'd be happy to have a VST or standalone version of Mobius that
would run on OS X, exactly the way it already works on Windows...
Krispen Hartung wrote:
We are on to looping nirvana
here...a hardware Mobius, a VST EDP and Looperlative.....I'd donate to
the pool of development dollars for a VST Looperlative or EDP. Not that
Mobius isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread...I'm just looping
VST greedy. I'm run them all in my VST host!
Kris
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday, February 19, 2007 11:04 AM
Subject:
Re: Considering building an ultimate looper...
Seriously! Not to beat a dead horse, but a hardware Mobius host (even
if it was just a mini-PC that boots straight into Mobius with onboard
audio/midi i/o) would be incredible.
--Josh
midifriedchicken@comcast.net
wrote:
Well, the hardware version wouldn't munch up your CPU. So
you could use Ableton Live and all its goodies. And Mac users could use
it.
--------------
Original message --------------
From: Joshua Carroll <josh@infinivert.com>
Oooh, and it would be even better if it had 8 stereo EDPs that
could run in or out of sync with eachother...
Oh wait, we're describing Mobius again...
Ha! :)
--Josh
midifriedchicken@comcast.net
wrote:
I'll tell you exactly what the ultimate looper is. Save
you some trouble.
Essentially it would be a stereo (or even surround)
Echoplex. All the same functions.
Rock solid syncing capabilities. No drifting!!
Custom foot controller similer to the FCB1010, except
smaller. With 10 or so built in options of layouts. But also capable of
custom layouts.
10 gigs of storage.
Small Bluetooth LCD display screen that can be mounted
to a mic stand.
Firewire, or USB connections.
Balanced and Unbalanced outs.
VST interface so the entire unit can be placed into
DAW's and be controlled seamlessly.
1 Rack space
under $300
Free 24 hour support line.
Now, get busy.
MFC
--------------
Original message --------------
From: "GORDIUS info" <info@gordius.be>
>
> I'd like to add one question to this :
> What kind of (physical) volume control device do you target, Bob?
Something
> else than a foot pedal?
> I'm asking, because I am currently testing out a new design for a
> MIDI-controlled foot pedal. And to me it seems that the "physical
range" of
> a standard foot pedal is no more than 7 bit. I mean : I have
trouble making
> small enough movements to change the control value with 1 single
step in the
> 128-value range. Therefore I believe a 10-bit ADC wouldn't make
any sense
> when using a footpedal, but maybe you have another type of
controller in
> mind?
>
> (if you intend to manipulate the linear footpedal range and make
it a
> non-linear transition cur ve, I would believe you will get much
better
> results just using a 7-bit to n-bit lookup table in firmware,
rather than
> doing it with some analog signal manipulation followed by 10-bit
AD
> conversion).
>
> Xavier
> http://www.gordius.be
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Larson [mailto:jeff@zonemobius.com]
> Sent: zaterdag 17 februari 2007 23:35
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: Considering building an ultimate looper...
>
> Ok, here's some friendly advice.
>
> Be careful tossing out words like "ultimate looper" on this list.
So far > you've described a rather basic looper, except
that you seem to be obsessed
> with the resolution of the output level control. In all the wish
lists and
> product reviews that appear regularly on this list, this is not a
feature
> that I remember being mentioned.
>
> If you're intending to compete in the hardware looper market, I
would be
> much more concerned about things like continuous feedback,
synchronization
> with external MIDI clocks, pitch and rate shifting, and "editing"
functions
> like insert, multiply, replace, etc.
>
> Second, the insinuation that the Looperlative is not "professional
level" is
> likely to annoy the many professional level musicians that use it,
as well
> as the professional level musicians that use other devices and
software with
> a MIDI volume control.
>
> Quick show of hands. Does anyone find that their musical ambitions
are
> bei ng stymied by the resolution of their volume pedal?
>
> I don't doubt that there are devices that could do a better job
smoothing
> controller changes, or providing a more musically useful
attenuation curve
> at the top end of the range. But there are software soluti ons to
these
> problems that are quite effective if not perfect.
>
> I don't mean to sound discouraging, but this strikes me as a
rather odd
> feature to be focusing on. Before you start investing money in
this
> venture, be sure you have a good understanding of the market for
hardware
> loopers.
>
> Jeff
>
|
