Support |
I agree regarding the Digitech.. I had mine for a little over a year when the Stop/Tempo pedal started malfunctioning. Digitech fixed it under warranty, but still, it appears they do earn the reputation for faulty gear. Since then, I have acquired a Gibson Echoplex Digital Pro Plus... actually, I had to return the first one... it kept crashing. It it certainly a more full-featured device.. a tad on the expensive side, but worth it in my opinion. Now I just use the JamMan to capture loops from the EDP. The USB connection on the JamMan is a much simpler means of getting the files to the computer than a midi dump. Regards John On Mar 18, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Darren Nelsen wrote: > I hate to make a blanket statement, but in my book, anything > Digitech = crap in terms of production quality. In other words, > it'll break. I've never been happy with any Digitech device I've > ever had. (Had to send one device back to the manufacturer twice, > and it still broke.) Even sales reps point me away from Digitech > when I ask about durability. This seems to be notorious with Digitech. > > I'm a fairly new looper too. I just purchased the Boss RC-50. I > love it. It does what you've described (pretty much), but there's a > limit to the amount of subtractions you can do. You have three > "phrases" that you can record to, layer onto. You can drop any one > of the phrases out at any time, bring them back, or re-record them. > It has 99 patches and you can switch between patches on the fly, > tho there seems to be some glitch that's been reported here on the > list. (I don't switch between patches within a single composition, > so not an issue for me.) > > Darren > > On Mar 18, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Seth Hain wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm looking for an introductory looper. I've been looking at the >> DigiTech JamMan. The material on it states that one may record up to >> 99 loops. As I'm new to these I want to make sure it will do what I >> want, mainly be able to on-the-fly record a sample and start it >> looping and then record another sample and start it looping and >> continue in these manner and then subtract off the loops in any order >> I want. Is this feasible with the JamMan. Did I just describe a >> looper in general? Any help would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> Seth >