Support |
Jeffrey Larson wrote: > > > My opinion...this is totally asinine, if true, and folks > > should storm the Bastille to change it. :) > > Yes, on the surface this sounds like a supremely dumb design choice. > Build a device that can only run Windows DLLs, but doesn't actually > run Windows, so developers have yet another platform to support. I > hope there were good reasons for doing this, perhaps it is difficult > to make Windows run well on hardware like this, maybe there were > licensing issues. I'm sure there were OS modifications they could do > to Linux to make it more reliable that could never be done to Windows. AFAIR from the first product, most things non-Linux was licenced stufff with their (part) own wrappers, that had to be paid for. I was resently corrected WRT VST on Linux et al.., which I didn't know was opensourced (though on a license). At least no VST implementation existed back then, readily available to developers for general use. I'll just zip it for now, else I'll get myself on too thin ice ;) -- rgds, van Sinn