Support |
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:36 PM, phillip wilson <phillwilson@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Interesting reply Per, > > I can see you point of view but again would argue there are many other > people doing activities that take huge amounts of dedication and practice > that also hold down a real job. Is that an argument for not paying for a good artist performance? What jobs are "real" enough to qualify for supporting artistic work that is done for free? > I believe > that those greats how loved their music above all else would find cunning > ways to make money in a manner that still afforded the time to make >music. I know that's how it is. But isn't everyone positive to pay for good music and art? We pay for it because we love it and want it! And I think it's just natural wanting to pay a person that creates this art in order to keep his/her skills up and evolve without being slowed down by "a job on the side". -- Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.boysen.se (Swedish) www.looproom.com (international) www.stockholm-athens.com