Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Building 7 is the thing that gets me. It fell straight down after a small fire burned for 5 hours in one corner. Impossible. Plus, a bunch of really experienced pilots tried to hit the wtc in a flight simulator under the same conditions and couldn't do it. There's a ton of curiosities that don't make sense. Now I don't think the bush guys could possibly be responsible. One reason, it worked. But I do think it's possible that they knew about it and let it happen in an effort to facilitate their ambitions. I know, I'm crazy. I realize that if any of this is true, we are WAY more fucked then we thought possible. On Aug 3, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Mark Smart wrote: > Well, I haven't read much about 9/11 conspiracy theories so far, so I > don't have immediate replies for all these. My reaction to the way > this video is put together and to conspiracy theories in general is > EXTREME SKEPTICISM. The WTC controlled demolition hypothesis to me > seems utterly outrageous. A huge plane filled with jet fuel crashes > into a building creating a fire that burns above 2000 degrees F > (easily hot enough to soften steel...I used to work in a steel mill, > and heating it to this temp is plenty to soften it up for easy > milling) and the building is NOT supposed to collapse? That's hard for > me to buy. Plus trying to hide massive amounts of explosives in a > building without anyone noticing. The simpler explanation tends to be > the correct one (Occam's Razor). > > But I will watch some more and do some more reading. > > -- > Mark Smart > http://cdbaby.com/cd/marksmart > http://www.marksmart.net >