Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
One of the many problems with the controlled demolition hypothesis...in every video I've ever seen of a controlled demolition of a building, there is a series of extremely loud and usually visible explosions preceding the collapse....BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG...I don't see or hear this in the WTC collapse videos. On 8/3/08, Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> wrote: > > I have an alternative theory to present: > > In 1993 an attempt was made to tip over the WTC building via a truck > bomb in the corner of the parking garage. > > This attack was primitive and ineffective largely because the bombers > were ignorant of the building's design. > > The "powers that be" were suddenly faced with the real possibility > that there may be a situation where the buildings could become > unstable if they were damaged due to fire or bombing or whatever and > cause unspeakable collateral damage to lower Manhattan. > > The buildings were therefor prewired for controlled demolition > sometime over the following 18 years and the decision was made to > implode them after the planes hit in September 2001. > > The "official" explanation (i.e. jet fuel caused the colapse) is > preposterous, as is the attept to blame the collase of WTC #7 on > "raging fires". > > -Chuck Zwicky > > > >> > They're talking seriously and from an engineer's POV about such >>> apparent facts as that not a single steel-frame skyscraper in history >>> has ever collapsed due to fire, even though many have burned much >>> hotter than the Twin Towers did, or could have if it was only a jet- >>> fuel fire. >> >>I was not aware of this. Where can I find information about these >>other skyscraper fires with no collapse? Were the fires as large as >>the ones at the WTC? >> >>-- >>Mark Smart >>http://cdbaby.com/cd/marksmart >>http://www.marksmart.net > > > -- > ... > http://www.zmix.net > > -- Mark Smart http://cdbaby.com/cd/marksmart http://www.marksmart.net