Re: Very OT: Zeitgeist, The Movie... WAS... Semi-OT: Int'l Travellers' Laptops Confiscated...

[Chris Sewell <midifriedchicken@comcast.net>]

Unfortunately, all who question are lumped together as one mass group  
of crazys. I for one don't know what happened. I have been made aware  
of enough peculiarities in the official story to make me question it.
On Aug 3, 2008, at 10:43 PM, David Coffin wrote:

> Seems reasonable.
>
> But then one must consider that "the powers" chose to:
>
> Not admit to this.
> Pull the trigger in such as way as to add villainy to the  
> terrorists crime (presumably because it would benefit their own  
> political motives) rather than from any concern for the city, the  
> citizens or the firefighters.
> Made every effort afterwards to keep this from being discovered.
>
> Still stinks.
> dc
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2008, at 7:06 PM, Charles Zwicky wrote:
>> I have an alternative theory to present:
>>
>> In 1993 an attempt was made to tip over the WTC building via a  
>> truck bomb in the corner of the parking garage.
>>
>> This attack was primitive and ineffective largely because the  
>> bombers were ignorant of the building's design.
>>
>> The "powers that be" were suddenly faced with the real possibility  
>> that there may be a situation where the buildings could become  
>> unstable if they were damaged due to fire or bombing or whatever  
>> and cause unspeakable collateral damage to lower Manhattan.
>>
>> The buildings were therefor prewired for controlled demolition  
>> sometime over the following 18 years and the decision was made to  
>> implode them after the planes hit in September 2001.
>>
>> The "official" explanation (i.e. jet fuel caused the colapse) is  
>> preposterous, as is the attept to blame the collase of WTC #7 on  
>> "raging fires".
>>
>> -Chuck Zwicky
>