Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
ah great but does open beta means ptp cracks ? :=) there is also a windows version if you ask Calude Per Boysen a écrit : > The other day I heard that SoundDiver is still available online as an > open beta version. Google it! But it doesn't seem it will ever be > released again for OS X (was OS 9 back in the days) because most users > gravitate towards using virtual instruments in software rather than > external devices. > > Greetings from Sweden > > Per Boysen > www.boysen.se > www.perboysen.com > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Claude Voit <c.voit@vtx.ch> wrote: >> yes I _have_ known that !! >> edp sys ex is simple, and, If you have (or know where to find) Emagic's >> (editor librarian) Sound diver, I have made a EDP sys module you could >use >> to program your edp and also copy paste all the messages for edp sys ex >> sends. but, be aware that audio maybe interrupted if loop is playing and >> sync may also drift. >> I only used sys to change params with sysex while in reset. >> >> It works fine but you'll have to dig in sys ex and in the manual, and, >> nobody can do it for you if you really want to be a power user... >> :=) >> >> Good luck >> >> Claude >> >> http://www.loopers-delight.com/tools/echoplex/echoplex.html >> >> andy butler a écrit : >>> mark francombe wrote: >>> >>>> Question #2 >>>> >>>> I havent tried to do this yet, and I could, but maybe Per remembers, >or >>>> Andy knows.... but one clever thing I thought of wopuld be to program >the >>>> settings of the edp via a drum machine. So instead of changing premade >>>> "presets", one uses the midi command for the PARAMETER button, and >then the >>>> midi command to select the parameter, then the command to change the >>>> parameter. Now if I did this... how FAST would EDP accept these >changes? >>>> could I program each command one 64th apart, faster? >>>> >>> In theory, it's possible and fast enough, though I don't know exactly >how >>> fast. >>> >>> One problem that would make it rather fiddly though. >>> When you've pressed Param, you're scrolling through the settings, >rather >>> than being able to set an absolute value. >>> So a sequence of commands would change the parameters, but the result >>> would depend on what they were to start with. >>> >>> eg >>> >>> the button sequence Param>Param>Rec>Rec >>> >>> would change RecMode from SAF to SUS, >>> or from TOG to SAF >>> or from SUS to TOG >>> ...but would only do so if you weren't in Parameter Mode to start with. >>> >>> ...and that button sequence would leave you in Param Mode, from >>> which you could only exit with a Long Press of Param, which means it's >>> 400mS before you can use any controls. >>> >>> Reliably set (say) RecMode to SUS under any circumstance you'd have to >do >>> >>> LongParam (in case you were already in parameter mode) >>> Param >>> Param >>> LongRec (set Record to TOG, as longpress sets to default) >>> Rec >>> >>> which is going to take >800mS >>> >>> >>> In short...it's very awkward. >>> >>> It seems it's possible to do exactly what you want with Midi Sysex. >>> Claude Voit would know that, ( well Matthias *might* too ). >>> It's *kind of* in the loop4 manual at the end, >>> but not very explicit. >>> >>> I have to admit that I've avoided looking into this, >>> and so far it's always been possible to do what I wanted without it. >>> I wouldn't be surprised if it's buggy. >>> >>> >>> Having written all that...tell me *why* you want to change params so >fast? >>> It's almost certainly possible to achieve what you want without >changing >>> params at all. >>> >>> andy >>> ps >>> these days the Gordius LG has a lot of sequencer like features, >>> including sync to incoming midi clock. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >