Support |
On 12/22/09, Matt Davignon <mattdavignon@gmail.com> wrote: > This is something that's discussed in depth in my local experimental > music community. > > As much as they may like the actual music, it's very hard to get > people to go to a concert or listen to a cd if the music is described > as "cutting edge", "adventurous", or even "new". A more successful > tactic may be to draw similarities to music they already like. > > I can think of 2 possible reasons for this. Not sure which is more true. > > 1) I think human brains have an aversion to "too much information" or > "unknown quantities". If I were to ask an average person, "Would you > rather go to McDonalds, or to someplace where the rules of physics > don't apply," most folks would choose McDonald's. > > 2) As someone who listens to a lot of "out there" music, I find that > the more people claim their music is "bizarre" or "like something > you've never heard before", the more sophomoric and predictable the > music seems to be. I find the best weird music is from people who've > been doing it long enough that they don't find it weird. > > -- > Matt Davignon > www.ribosomemusic.com > Rigs! www.youtube.com/user/ribosomematt > > -- Sent from my mobile device ReUse, an introspective textural aural www.myspace.com/CtReUse music links... www.jimgoodinmusic.com www.chinapaintingmusic.com www.myspace.com/jimgoodinmusic www.myspace.com/chinapaintingmusic www.myspace.com/jimgoodinviolinelectro www.myspace.com/jindream www.youtube.com/jimgoodinmusic video work/editing... www.vimeo.com/jimgoodindigital social networking... www.twitter.com/jimgoodinmusic