] [Thread Prev
Re: Polymeter - Polyrhythm - Changing Meter
Nous somme d'accorde!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Raul Bonell <email@example.com>
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: Polymeter - Polyrhythm - Changing Meter
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:31:21 +0200
> 2010/9/9 Mark Showalter <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > Hello,
> > I think the overall point, which we seem to agree on, is that you
> > write the arrangement in the >time sig & tempo etc that makes the
> > most sense & is the easiest to read. I was taugh by one >of my
> > composition teachers in music school that you always work from
> > the graetest >sub-division back to plan how you would right a
> > piece. So, if there are 128th note values as >the greatest
> > sub-division, you don't write the time signature as 64/128. That
> > would be >ridiculous. It's still easier to have to deal with
> > those notes on the ocassions they appear. If >everything is
> > written in 128th notes by some dummy, you simply turn them all
> > into quarter or >eigth notes to simplify reading, & of course,
> > counting.
> totally agree!
> > My point wasn't that you should write a waltz that way at all. It
> > would be the opposite of >simple, but no listener would know that
> > the music was written in 4/4 if it was properly notated, >but it
> > would be just a silly excersize in complex notation.
> even more than totally agree!
> I bé, després estava aquella dona que sense saber que estava
> il.luminada, exclamava: "O siga, que he pagat per aquesta merda de
> màquina i resulta que ni tan sols em diu si sóc un Buda o no, òsties!,
> no podien posar-li una agulla , o que pitara, o alguna cosa així? "
> Raul Bonell at Blogger: http://raulbonell.blogspot.com
> Chain Tape Collective: http://www.ct-collective.com
<a href="http://www.mylivesignature.com" target="_blank"><img
style="border: 0 !important; background: transparent;"/></a>
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com