[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Re: unsubscribe
As you say Rick, compared to..()...I suppose they are still experimental.
I like the album just fine. That said I don't hear anything new for them. It does sound much more minimal if not unfinished as was mentioned. I got into them with OK Computer then Amnesiac/Kid A which I really still dig! Since then I have been underwhelmed, not to say I find them unlistenable or anything. I think I am the only one who didn't really care so much for In Rainbows. I like this one much better, for me very listenable while cruising the highway! :)
Where they are really experimental and at the forefront is in the way they are taking control of their music. Bypassing traditional outlets and going the way they are is great. I bought the 320 mp3 version for 9 bucks. Although a short album I consider this a good value.
my 2.5,
J
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Rick Walker
<looppool@cruzio.com> wrote:
On 7/22/64 11:59 AM, mark francombe wrote:
Can somebody tell me what is so experimental about Radiohead? Are there 2 bands called Radiohead...am I listening to the wrong one?
Compared to the overall prosaic quality of mainstream commercial music in the past five years,
Radio head is very experimental. Kid A didn't sound like anything on the radio when it came out.
Compared to music called experimental in the 'experimental' section of Streetlight Records,
Radiohead can be lumped in with the Beach Boys.
It's all relative, Mark, but I think you know that...........<grin>
hugs, bro, rick
