Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Interesting critique of Wednesdays' Y2KX+1 show



I would tell them, "Yes, please listen carefully."

Lindsey

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Thomas <danielthomas4@mac.com> wrote:
> Greetings from Bill's Porch

One of the great respites on planet earth. I love Bill's porch.  Its seen more than a few good guitar pickin sessions.  Great to have you as a guest in Santa Cruz, Mr. Boysen.

cheers
Daniel
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Per Boysen wrote:

> I always find it interesting to hear how different people experience
> music. It seems each of us have our personal filtering system ;-)
> However, "avant-garde" was quite surprising here as only Nat's set was
> atonal while all others used melodies and chords as a major
> steppingstone. Maybe the fact that Nat's set was last left it as the
> dominating memory fragment in this person? I also remember that Rick
> joined in with Nat coming walking from behind the audience, a classic
> "avant-garde trick", and that might have triggered some personal bias
> within the listener?
>
> Personally I hope Nat will play similar music on Sunday cuz I'd love
> to hear those exciting sounds on the good system in the better
> acoustic environment of Pearl Alley Studios. See you there, guys.
>
> Greetings from Bill's Porch
>
> Per Boysen
> www.boysen.se
> www.perboysen.com
> www.looproom.com internet music hub
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think I can feel what the guy meant with "conventional" and I think people
>> who like such music are interested in yours, Kevin
>> but thats just an opinion...
>> On 13 Oct 2011, at 20:10, kkissinger@kevinkissinger.com wrote:
>>
>> I don't really consider my music to be "avante-garde" however it is
>> unconventional.  A festival of "conventional" music would not be interested
>> in me, anyway.
>>
>>
>>
>