Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
As an AxeFx 2 user, the AxeFx gets a huge vote from me. It not only works for electrics, but also for acoustics and basses--not just works, but jawdroppingly, spectacularly well! I was skeptical at first, but when I got my AF2, I quickly sold off my Two Rocks and collection of tweed Fenders and late 60's Marshalls. It's really like having a Pendulum, all the best electric guitar amps you ever wanted plus a huge effects rack full of your favorite TCs and Eventides etc. with great connectivity to PA, powered speakers, DAWs. All I have in my rack right now is the AF2, a couple EDPs and a mixer. In all fairness, I haven't tried the Kemper, but with the AF2 I have so many great options at my fingertips right now that I am not even tempted. P On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:45 PM, Per Boysen wrote: > Two more points on the Axe-Fx 2: It allows to be used as two amps. > That's a big deal for us that play instruments with two groups of > strings and dual output busses. I also like the option to digitally > connect a laptop for looping through USB, thus skipping over the need > to bring a separate audio interface (as the Axe-Fx 2 performs these > duties). > > Greetings from Sweden > > Per Boysen > www.perboysen.com > http://www.youtube.com/perboysen > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jeff Shirkey <jcshirke@frontier.com> > wrote: >> I spent a long time trying to decide between the Kemper and the Axe-Fx >> 2. >> >> Now that the Axe 2 has "tone matching", which is quite similar to what >> the >> Kemper does with profiling, I think it's the better buy. I'm not >> knocking >> the Kemper, since it can do some pretty amazing stuff, but I think the >> Axe 2 >> is by far the more complete package if you want fx, a ton of on-board >> amp >> models (that sound superb with the latest firmware release), frequent >> (comprehensive, free) firmware upgrades, tons of ins/outs, *and* now the >> ability to match your own amps/cabs. >> >> To me, it's the hands-down winner. >