Support |
Yes! I don't think the article I linked to has ever been brought up on this site. The shabby one about live looping has. Tyler Z On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:32:38 +0100, mark francombe wrote: >Its is lame, but the original article was very lame too. Poorly written, >bad >english, and most importantly for Wikipedia, totally disregarding their >rigid >standards for citation of sources. I don't know who was responsible for >it, but >it appears to be by one of the iOS developers... and theres a Wiki >violation >right there. >For Wikipedia to be any use, it has to maintain these standards, unless >it >wants to become a forum troll trap, or a Facebook Kitchen sink chat room. >I for one would NOT be up for the job. However the more general "Loop" >aricle >that Tyler cited >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music)is quite ok. Despite SOME >additions, >and a few more examples, it could be that the Live Looping page should >just be >deleted and redirected to tis one. >Mark >On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Z <zzz@zzz.ch> wrote: >Hello all! >Some guy or admin decided to decimate the wikipedia page on livelooping. >I >tried to undo his changes but with no success, says there needs to be >more >'references'... It might be a good time for those of us who'd be eager to >share >their stories to rebuild it? It totally is lame right now.. >http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_looping >Cheers >:) >z >-- >Mark Francombe >www.markfrancombe.com >www.ordoabkhao.com >http://vimeo.com/user825094 >http://www.looop.no >twitter @markfrancombe