Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
what about having bits of Rick Walker's http://www.livelooping.org/history_concepts/ page? if he's ok with it?
> Mark F says
>
>>> I for one would NOT be up for the job.
>
> me neither, don't think I'm indepedant enough.
>
>>> However the more general "Loop" aricle that Tyler cited
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music) is quite ok. Despite SOME additions, and a few more examples, it could be that the Live Looping page should just be deleted and redirected to tis one.
>>>
>>> Mark
>
> Well, if we have a *reference* to support the idea that live-looping
> is some kind of art form in it's own right then surely
> it can have it's own page.
>
> But what exactly qualifies as a reference?
>
>
> I learned a bit from that article.
> Standard way to spam wikipedia for self promotion is to write
> bits of biog then do a bogus reference which is actually one of your youtube vids.
> Then it it *looks* like you're playing fair with wikipedia.
>
>
>
> andy
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Z <zzz@zzz.ch <mailto:zzz@zzz.ch>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all!
>>> Some guy or admin decided to decimate the wikipedia page on livelooping. I tried to undo his changes but with no success, says there needs to be more 'references'... It might be a good time for those of us who'd be eager to share their stories to rebuild it? It totally is lame right now..
>>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_looping
>>> Cheers
>>> :)
>>> z
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> /_Mark Francombe_/
>>> www.markfrancombe.com <http://www.markfrancombe.com/>
>>> www.ordoabkhao.com <http://www.ordoabkhao.com/>
>>> http://vimeo.com/user825094
>>> http://www.looop.no <http://www.looop.no/>
>>> twitter @markfrancombe
>