Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: wikipedia page on livelooping

Yes! I am one of those people that we don't have enough of on this list. I 
think that looping is looping, whether 
it's done in real time or with a computer program when mixing. I believe 
that looping is looping, and some 
looping just happens to be live, so the Loop (music) article mentioning 
live looping is fine. 
Maybe a link to loopers-delight.com in the external links section and a 
few more references 
to famous live loopers would do. Heck, pretty soon, Per Boysen will be 
deserving his own article!
Tyler Z
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:36:33 +0100, mark francombe wrote:

>I still don't see the problem of just linking up the Live Looping page to 
>more general Loop music page. Its got everything we want there, Terry 
>Fripp /Eno, even a line about Santa Cruz festivals...
>Read it guys... wont it do?
>Just cos YOUR favourite looper (box, software or musician) isn't 
>are we really so unique that we need our own page?
>On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Sylvain Poitras 
>I haven't bothered with wikipedia in a while... I've used it mostly to 
>on tv episodes I've missed and toget a crash course on some mathematical 
>equations. It's quite good for both those things...

>The problem with livelooping is that people who care about itare also 
>likely involved with it and have no business writing a wikipedia article 

>Mark Francombe
>twitter @markfrancombe