Re: long analog delay

["James Winger" <jdwinger@hotmail.com>]

Mr Monk

Here is a quick and dirty of a system that should give you (memory man) 
tones with longer delay times.

Note : it's not ESSENTIAL to have the mixes at 100% - but for test 
purposes 
it's good.  Remember that the only real essential is to have the FBACK of 
both delays at 0% (it won't hurt anything to have it higher, but you'll 
get 
a multitap sound - if you just want simple delays keep them at zero)

The number of echos will now be controlled through the mixer
and remember, if you want dry signal THROUGH the delays (as opposed to on 
another channel) BOTH mixes will have to be upped


Here is a sample config through a mixer


Mixer Aux A --> Analog Delay Input
Analog Delay Output ---> digital delay Input
Digital Delay Output ----> channel 1 input

Channel 1's Aux A feed will control your regen (number of echos)

To add the effect to any channel, simply feed to Aux A

Channel 1's LEVEL will control eho volume

Note : this assumes your aux is prefade








From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net>
Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: long analog delay
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543)
Received: from mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.47]) by 
mc7-s12.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 
Jan 
2003 13:55:15 -0800
Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by 
mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 
Jan 
2003 13:55:15 -0800
Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id 
QAA08047;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500
Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net>
In-Reply-To: <F165RhQdOgl4rhYQYx300009cca@hotmail.com>
Message-Id: <1E047D91-2E54-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543)
Resent-Message-ID: <YLw_6B.A.q9B.fMxL-@hemlock.violacea.com>
Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> archive/latest/29018
X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 21:55:15.0320 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[F20A3780:01C2C260]

can you add another bucket brigade to a memory man? is there a tech who 
will 
do this?


On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 04:45 PM, James Winger wrote:

>DOD had one (FX96) at about 500ms.  It used a single 3005.
>
>Funny thing, I had one and would run it on this really poorly regulated 
>supply...it must have altered the clock as it would pump out delays of 
>well 
>over a second
>Note : what came out was very weird, it was an echo -- but it was very 
>distorted (not overdrive / clipping distorted or simply low-frequency 
>from 
>the slow clock)
>
>you've got a couple of options I guess - chain 2 BBD's together (you'll 
>get 
>some loss from twice the buckets)
>
>lower the clock speed (changes sampling rate and will restrict the 
>frequency response, it might also start sounding "grainy")
>
>
>
>
>
>From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net>
>Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>Subject: long analog delay
>Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543)
>Received: from mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.17]) by 
>mc7-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 
>Jan 
>2003 12:44:30 -0800
>Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by 
>mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 
>Jan 
>2003 12:44:29 -0800
>Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id 
>PAA31711;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
>Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
>Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net>
>In-Reply-To: <00b301c2c257$f50f5040$69894682@lance>
>Message-Id: <3BB51D2C-2E4A-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net>
>X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543)
>Resent-Message-ID: <88HQbC.A.ZvH.PKwL-@hemlock.violacea.com>
>Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> archive/latest/29008
>X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>Precedence: list
>Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
>Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 20:44:29.0984 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[0F9F5A00:01C2C257]
>
>does anyone know of a longish (850 ms +) analog delay?  i'm thinking 
>about 
>trying to have the memory modified to go twice as long.. just curious. 
>i'm 
>of course leaving out the highly regarded but insanely priced EH 16sec 
>delay. 1 second would be enough for me. i have the ubiquitous DL4 and 
>although i do like it, the memory man is the least realistic of all the 
>delays IMHO...
>
>
>thanks
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

2delays.gif