Re: long analog delay

["mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net>]

thanks, i'm familiar with the process ( i mostly produce records for a 
living and i own a biggi-sh recording studio...) but what i'm after is 
the ability to have a smaller pedal that i can step on a button and 
have that "thing" that the memory man has, but longer.  i should 
probably just deal with the sound of the DL4 and forget it. for live 
stuff i'm looking for that sound and vibe AND portability.

but thanks for putting all that effort into your response. i do 
appreciate it.


monk



On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 02:23 PM, James Winger wrote:

> Mr Monk
>
> Here is a quick and dirty of a system that should give you (memory 
> man) tones with longer delay times.
>
> Note : it's not ESSENTIAL to have the mixes at 100% - but for test 
> purposes it's good.  Remember that the only real essential is to have 
> the FBACK of both delays at 0% (it won't hurt anything to have it 
> higher, but you'll get a multitap sound - if you just want simple 
> delays keep them at zero)
>
> The number of echos will now be controlled through the mixer
> and remember, if you want dry signal THROUGH the delays (as opposed to 
> on another channel) BOTH mixes will have to be upped
>
>
> Here is a sample config through a mixer
>
>
> Mixer Aux A --> Analog Delay Input
> Analog Delay Output ---> digital delay Input
> Digital Delay Output ----> channel 1 input
>
> Channel 1's Aux A feed will control your regen (number of echos)
>
> To add the effect to any channel, simply feed to Aux A
>
> Channel 1's LEVEL will control eho volume
>
> Note : this assumes your aux is prefade
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net>
> Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: long analog delay
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:44 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543)
> Received: from mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.47]) by 
> mc7-s12.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 
> 22 Jan 2003 13:55:15 -0800
> Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by 
> mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 
> 22 Jan 2003 13:55:15 -0800
> Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) 
> id QAA08047;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500
> Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500
> Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net>
> In-Reply-To: <F165RhQdOgl4rhYQYx300009cca@hotmail.com>
> Message-Id: <1E047D91-2E54-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net>
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543)
> Resent-Message-ID: <YLw_6B.A.q9B.fMxL-@hemlock.violacea.com>
> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> 
> archive/latest/29018
> X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
> Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 21:55:15.0320 (UTC) 
> FILETIME=[F20A3780:01C2C260]
>
> can you add another bucket brigade to a memory man? is there a tech 
> who will do this?
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 04:45 PM, James Winger wrote:
>
>> DOD had one (FX96) at about 500ms.  It used a single 3005.
>>
>> Funny thing, I had one and would run it on this really poorly 
>> regulated supply...it must have altered the clock as it would pump 
>> out delays of well over a second
>> Note : what came out was very weird, it was an echo -- but it was 
>> very distorted (not overdrive / clipping distorted or simply 
>> low-frequency from the slow clock)
>>
>> you've got a couple of options I guess - chain 2 BBD's together 
>> (you'll get some loss from twice the buckets)
>>
>> lower the clock speed (changes sampling rate and will restrict the 
>> frequency response, it might also start sounding "grainy")
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net>
>> Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> Subject: long analog delay
>> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
>> MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543)
>> Received: from mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.17]) by 
>> mc7-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 
>> 22 Jan 2003 12:44:30 -0800
>> Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by 
>> mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 
>> 22 Jan 2003 12:44:29 -0800
>> Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com 
>> (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA31711;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
>> Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
>> Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net>
>> In-Reply-To: <00b301c2c257$f50f5040$69894682@lance>
>> Message-Id: <3BB51D2C-2E4A-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net>
>> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543)
>> Resent-Message-ID: <88HQbC.A.ZvH.PKwL-@hemlock.violacea.com>
>> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> 
>> archive/latest/29008
>> X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> Precedence: list
>> Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
>> Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 20:44:29.0984 (UTC) 
>> FILETIME=[0F9F5A00:01C2C257]
>>
>> does anyone know of a longish (850 ms +) analog delay?  i'm thinking 
>> about trying to have the memory modified to go twice as long.. just 
>> curious. i'm of course leaving out the highly regarded but insanely 
>> priced EH 16sec delay. 1 second would be enough for me. i have the 
>> ubiquitous DL4 and although i do like it, the memory man is the least 
>> realistic of all the delays IMHO...
>>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
>> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> <2delays.gif>