Re: Stereo-zation

[Mark Sottilaro <sine@zerocrossing.net>]

Awe, that sucks.  It looks cool and promising.  Thanks for the info.

Mark

On Jul 2, 2004, at 6:59 AM, Shane Whitbread wrote:

> The philtre is a excellent post looper fx.  The faze just 
> kinda.....stinks.
> I regret buying it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "msottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 2:54 PM
> Subject: Stereo-zation
>
>
>> Yup, sorry Stanitarium!  I DO LOVE THE STEREO CHORUS SOUND!
>>
>> After playing with the EH-16 a bunch yesterday, I realized that as 
>> well
>> as being a cool mono looper for playing live, it also sits nicely in 
>> my
>> studio for extra looping fun.  At one point I had asynchronous loops
>> going on the EH-16, Gigadelay (Not true about the tone control, it's
>> neutral when at 12:00) and lastly the 8 sec looper on board the Vox
>> Tonelab SE.  I could have had my Repeater going as well, but I didn't
>> want to get greedy!
>>
>> So my question is this:  The EH-16 doesn't have the lo-fi "feature" of
>> it's father, but I do notice the monoization of my lush stereo 
>> chorused
>> sounds.  Again, not a big deal when playing live but in the studio I'm
>> thinking I'd like to be able to post process the output of the EH16.
>> I'd like it to be small and cheap, if possible.  I'm thinking of one 
>> of
>> those cheap little Alesis effects that do stereo modulation.  (the
>> Alesis FAZE)  Anyone try one of these?
>>
>> Should I hold out for something like a nanoverb?  Is the Line6 MM-4
>> worth it?  Basically I want mono in, stereo out.  Nothing too fancy.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>