Re: Sooperlooper or Mobius? Going back to software.

[andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>]

hi Jeff,
As you're our acknowledged expert on this: 

 Are you assuming that the latency of midi commands is zero?
Otherwise is it correct to set
Input latency compensation= audioIn latency=MidiIn latency
Output latency compensation = audioOut latency + midiIn latency ?



 From my limited software looping experienceI think it's worth 
  mentioning that when the player is monitoring 
   through the pc (e.g. when using amp sim software ) that the 
   easiest approach is to set the latency compensation to zero.
   (with possibly a tweak somewhere to account for the lack 
    of midi latency)

best regards

andy butler


Jeffrey Larson wrote:
>  > suggested latency is 5 and it reports 256 but when i do calibrate 
> latency it shows 360
>  > right now i have set to 360 i am going to play for a while with that 
> see how it behaves
>  > i had tried 256 and even 128 in the past but it felt heavier and 550 
> felt allright
>  > But lets see how it does with 360
>  > thanx!
> 
> There are three numbers shown on the calibration results dialog, first 
>the
> total "end to end" latency from the input port to the output port, then 
> suggestions
> for the input and output overrides.
> 
> The input/output suggestions should be close to half of the total 
> latency.  If they
> are way off then there may be an error in the calculations.  Try just 
> dividing
> the total latency by 2 and use that for the input/output overrides.  If 
>the
> total latency was reported as 360 then input/output should both be 180 
> which
> is pretty good.
> 
> Jeff
> 
>