Support |
> What would you guys like to see? Please tell me. I would dearly love > to hear from you on this issue. On a highly related note, tell me how > you use looping in your musical life: live performance, sound creation > for recording, practice, song development, etc. Well, Mr. Nelson, I'm glad you asked! I would, and I think I speak for a lot of us here, would gladly trade sampling time for a higher sampling rate. One of the things I like a lot about the Rang is that half speed/twice sampling rate- Believe me, few enjoy get pitch shifted down and dirty like I do. A lower sampling rate can be a beautiful thing- witness the EMU SP-1200(?) that drum machine with 12(?) bit, 33khz (help me out here I you guys know this) sampling. Sounds fantastic. The hip-hop locals used to kill themselves trying to get one of those from Sam Ass (pun intended), and with good reason. The most fun I had with your pedal was with the lowest rate, making a god-awful racket. One other thing that I haven't seen in any of the unit (doesn't mean it's not there, however) is a clean split (hopefully unbuffered) from the back of the box- meaning that without futzing about with mixers, fx loops, what-have-you you could run a line into, say, a sansamp, and then into the PA (leaving your guitar/amp sound unblemished) without needing a splitter box . I had a traumatic experience with a Morley ABY box that has left me scarred for life :) Many have called me a sucker for thinking I can hear the effect of buffering in fx pedal, but I at least think it makes a difference. It bothered me enough to beg a friend of mine to build me the world's only totally passive effects looper box when I was using ten pedals at a time. Just as an aside, the massive impedence mismatch of crappy old footpedal never really bothered me all that much. Go figure. Anyway, those are my two cents. PS- what ever happened to all the talk about a loopers delight CD? I kind of wanted to hear some your collective work... Trev