Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
PLEASE STOP SENDING THIS MESSAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've been recieving about ten (10) of the following message! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx At 05:56 PM 12/20/97 CST, ccMail SMTPLINK wrote: >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp07.dttus.com by ccbbn22.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:56:03 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp07.dttus.com (2.5 Build 2626 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.6) >with SMTP > id FAA00021 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >05:53:32 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA21847 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:53:45 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjYiC-0000XB-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:53:40 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:50:06 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882669006@ccbbn12.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"TLlyAB.A.ZL.PmFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1987 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:53:40 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp03.dttus.com by ccbbn12.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:50:03 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp03.dttus.com (2.0 Build 2144 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) >with SMTP > id RAA00013 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >17:47:32 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA21558 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:48:05 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjYcj-00005p-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:48:01 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:44:57 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882668697@ccbbn20.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"CNZjEC.A.eGH.IhFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1986 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:48:01 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp07.dttus.com by ccbbn20.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:44:56 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp07.dttus.com (2.5 Build 2626 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.6) >with SMTP > id FAA00005 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >05:42:20 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA21203 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:42:33 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjYXM-0007S3-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:42:28 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:40:01 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882668401@ccbbn13.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"hx_iS.A.zuG.wcFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1985 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:42:28 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp03.dttus.com by ccbbn13.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:39:59 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp03.dttus.com (2.0 Build 2144 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) >with SMTP > id RAA00065 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >17:37:26 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA20901 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:37:59 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjYSx-00071y-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:37:55 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:34:41 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882668081@ccbbn12.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"URuNxC.A.YSG.2XFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1984 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:37:55 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp03.dttus.com by ccbbn12.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:34:39 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp03.dttus.com (2.0 Build 2144 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) >with SMTP > id RAA00047 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >17:32:08 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA20582 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:32:41 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjYNc-0006YX-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:32:24 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:29:40 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882667780@ccbbn22.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"vu6Vq.A.f2F.0SFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1983 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:32:24 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp07.dttus.com by ccbbn22.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:29:39 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp07.dttus.com (2.5 Build 2626 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.6) >with SMTP > id FAA00020 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >05:27:08 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA20262 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:27:22 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjYIf-000670-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:27:17 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:25:00 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882667500@ccbbn3.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"eSf5-C.A.TXF.3NFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1982 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:27:17 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp01.dttus.com by ccbbn3.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:24:58 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp01.dttus.com (2.0 Build 2144 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) >with SMTP > id RAA00020 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >17:24:36 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA20006 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:23:02 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjYEU-0005ei-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:22:58 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:19:51 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882667191@ccbbn11.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"D17LkD.A.f-E.8JFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1981 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:22:58 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp03.dttus.com by ccbbn11.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:19:48 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp03.dttus.com (2.0 Build 2144 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) >with SMTP > id RAA00071 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >17:17:20 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA19671 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:17:54 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjY9W-0005BW-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:17:50 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:15:50 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@ccbbn14.dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882666950@ccbbn14.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"zQPY_B.A.ukE.UFFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1980 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:17:50 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp03.dttus.com by ccbbn14.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:15:48 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp03.dttus.com (2.0 Build 2144 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) >with SMTP > id RAA00060 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >17:13:25 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA19423 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:13:58 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjY5i-0004oz-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:13:54 -0800 >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:11:39 CST >From: admin_dtt.usa.hub@dttus.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) >Message-Id: <9711208826.AA882666699@ccbbn21.dttus.com> >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message >Resent-Message-Id: <"vvr2fD.A.DQE.sBFn0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1979 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:13:54 -0800 > >User brijackson is not defined > > Original text follows > ---------------------------------------------- >Received: from smtp07.dttus.com by ccbbn21.dttus.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) > ; Sat, 20 Dec 97 17:11:37 CST >Return-Path: <lists@slip.net> >Received: from dac-ans1.dttus.com (dac-ans1.dttus.com [10.5.10.45]) > by smtp07.dttus.com (2.5 Build 2626 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.6) >with SMTP > id FAA00032 for <brijackson@dttus.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 >05:08:56 -0600 >Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.NET) by dac-ans1.dttus.com with SMTP >id AA19174 > (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <brijackson@dttus.com>); > Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:09:09 -0600 >Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.73 #8) > id 0xjY12-0004QK-00; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:09:04 -0800 >X-Sender: ejmd@pop.erols.com >Message-Id: <l03130300b0c1e92d2856@[207.172.101.5]> >In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19971218204212.00cade5c@pop.chromatic.com> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 18:12:29 -0500 >To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >From: Ed Drake <ejmd@erols.com> >Subject: Re: PMC-10 >Resent-Message-Id: <"oEy8p.A.r3D.L8En0"@ferret> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/1978 >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net> >Resent-To: brijackson@dttus.com >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:09:04 -0800 > >kim said: > >>You might want to try the Rocktron All Access pedal. It looks to me like >the >>most powerful and rugged pedal out there, although the price is quite a >bit >>higher. ($500?) The people I know who don't pay much attention to the >price >>tag all seem to use the Rocktron. I'm not sure if it does what you're >>looking for though. > >kim, I checked into the All Access and the list price on that sucker is >$999, so I'm guessing the street price is $600 (ouch!) or more. Does >anyone >know for sure? Also on Rocktron's Web site there is a manual for the All >Access available to download in pdf format (Adobe Acrobat) so if anyone >more knowledgeable than myself wants to check it out and report back as to >whether this thing has all the capabilities needed, I know I'd appreciate >it. > >I'd love to check out a PMC-10, but I think the problem there is finding >one, and then if you do, crossing your fingers and hoping you don't get >one >with the memory crashing problem or a faulty hand held programmer. I've >done some Web searching for this unit but I've had no luck so far. This >will probably take time, patience, persistance and luck to find one of >these. > >ric hordinski mentioned the rfc-1 midigator. How does this unit stack up >feature wise to these other units? > >There is also a Yamaha Midi unit, that seemed at the time I checked on it, >to have a lot of features but I don't remember the model #. I do remember >downloading some info about it from Yamaha's Web site. I also remember I >hated the display which consisted of Patch/preset numbers and that was >all, >no patch naming. > >Finally, one other MIDI controller which I am aware of, is the PC-1600x >from Peavey. Now I've never been a big Peavey fan, but this seems to be an >incredibly deep controller, however as a guitarist this unit won't work >for >me because it is a desk/table >top controller. It has 16 buttons along the bottom with a slider/fader >over >each of the buttons. The buttons can be configured to work various ways >(toggle or momentary, etc) and the sliders can be assigned to send various >MIDI info as well. There is info about this device readily available at >the >Peavey web site if someone wants to check it out. I don't know the price >of >the PC-1600x but a friend of mine got one at a music store blowout for >$200. > >Anyway it's sad that the one of the most feature laden as well as possibly >most affordable but maybe not as roadworthy units (PMC-10) is no longer >being made. I'd like to compare all of these units and see what shakes out >as far as features, price, and availability. Maybe the market is ripe for >someone to come out with a top notch affordable MIDI controller or maybe >the market is so small, that's why the PMC-10 and the rfc-1 midigator are >no longer around and the All Access costs so much? > >Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >