Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Retraction and apology to LD and Vox (Re: Vox Tonelab for looping)



http://fiveways.illogic.net/loopers

There is both the hybird custom nano and the filter.

ENJOY ALL!


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "DJ" <dhjohnson@mindspring.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: Retraction and apology to LD and Vox (Re: Vox Tonelab for
looping)


> > Oh, have you seen the filter eko he designed?  amamzing!
>
> No I haven't.  Is it on his site?  Do you have a link?
>
> On Jun 19, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Shane Whitbread wrote:
>
> > I'm actually friends with maneco(from another board).  One of my
> > friends has
> > a custom nanolooper coming that is a hybird nanolooper/sample.  I
> > can't wait
> > to hear it.
> >
> > I had a conversation with him a few days ago, and his future seem very
> > bright.  He is a impressive builder.  Actually, no, he is the most
> > impressive builder going to date.
> >
> > Oh, have you seen the filter eko he designed?  amamzing!
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "DJ" <dhjohnson@mindspring.com>
> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:09 AM
> > Subject: Re: Retraction and apology to LD and Vox (Re: Vox Tonelab for
> > looping)
> >
> >
> >> I had one of those Moog delays.  It was 100% analog but the signal and
> >> repeats were clean as a whistle!  If you drove it to self-oscillate it
> >> would and the tone could almost become like that of an analog
> >> synthesizer (which I guess it sort of was as it was an analog circuit
> >> driven to oscillate) and you could change the pitch with the time
> >> knob.
> >>   You could get a lot of clean repeats out of that baby, and you could
> >> control most of the controls with a foot pedal.  No tap tempo though,
> >> no looping, and very expensive.  If I remember correctly I sold it for
> >> more than I bought it for.
> >>
> >> On another note, you sound like you should check out mancolooper's as
> >> of yet unreleased latest creation.  He said he is going to call it the
> >> nanosampler, as opposed to his nanolooper.  He told me it's in the
> >> works and will do looping, tap-tempo, self-oscillation with pitch
> >> shifting with the time knob, overdubbing, and make you breakfast in
> >> bed.  He's not 100% sure about that last feature, but I'm hoping he
> >> will include it.  ;0)  It could be just the pedal that many folks are
> >> looking for.  I can't wait until he posts info on his sight.
> >>
> >> On Jun 19, 2004, at 12:12 AM, the toy room wrote:
> >>
> >>> From Mark S.
> >>>
> >>> 10. HOLD DELAY (HOLD DLY) MONO IN/MONO OUT 1
> >>> If you assign "HOLD DLY" to the CONTROL pedal, you'll be able to hold
> >>> the delay
> >>> sound.
> >>> [1] "TIME" 1-8000 [ms] Sets the delay time.
> >>> [2] "FEEDBACK" 0.0-10.0 * Adjusts the amount of feedback.
> >>> [3] "TONE" 1.0-10.0 * Adjusts the tone of the delay sound.
> >>> [6] "MIX" 0.0-10.0 * Adjusts the mix amount of the delay sound.
> >>> CONTROL pedal: HOLD DLY: If you select "HOLD DLY" for the CONTROL
> >>> pedal, the delay sound will be held from the
> >>> moment you turn the pedal on.
> >>>
> >>> What the manual doesn't say is that when you change delay times it
> >>> behaves like the old Digitech PDS8000 and old analog delay pedals
> >>> where
> >>> you get all sorts of warping during the change.  That makes for some
> >>> fun effects.
> >>>
> >>> From Me:
> >>>
> >>> Well, with my curiosity sparked by Mark's input on the Vox Tonelab
> >>> SE,
> >>> I
> >>> trotted over to Guitar Center tonight to give it a whirl, with my
> >>> guitar
> >>> and my headphones packed into the trunk just in case.  They only had
> >>> the
> >>> desktop Tonelab out on display, so I tried that, assuming that the
> >>> units
> >>> would be the same.  They don't seem to be, following closer
> >>> inspection.
> >>> After two sets of malfunctioning headphones, I asked the salesman if
> >>> he
> >>> could actually bring out an SE and if I could grab my guitar and
> >>> headphones.  Ahhhh...much better.
> >>>
> >>> I am going to have to disagree with Mark's assessment that the 'hold
> >>> delay' on the Vox Tonelab is similar to the PDS-8000.  As for the
> >>> sheer
> >>> mechanics of getting the hold delay, I am sure I would need to work
> >>> on
> >>> it a bit more.  I didn't have the manual as well.  I was able to get
> >>> it
> >>> into 100% feedback mode, but couldn't figure out how to be playing
> >>> more
> >>> material over the top without it going into the delay line.  Perhaps
> >>> Mark would confirm whether this is possible.
> >>>
> >>> As for the 'time' adjustment.  This was where I was most
> >>> disappointed.
> >>> The movement of the time knob during the hold delay was totally
> >>> digital,
> >>> glitchy and useless sounding...making the time transitions of a DL4
> >>> (or
> >>> even better an Echo Pro) sound totally organic.  Now that's a little
> >>> sarcasm there, because adjusting the time knob on a DL4 is a dose of
> >>> reality that you are dealing with a SOFTWARE SIMULATION of a real
> >>> circuit.  As I said before, the Echo Pro is significantly better,
> >>> because if its infinite rotating time knob, which allows for slower
> >>> and
> >>> more controlled transitions.
> >>>
> >>> On the Tonelab, it hiccupped almost immediately and created very
> >>> unmusical effects.  Nothing like the wonderful sound washes you can
> >>> get
> >>> with a closed loop of a PDS-8000.  Also, with the PDS, you can turn
> >>> the
> >>> time knob down to the slowest, creating a rumbling chaos, then
> >>> 'reopen'
> >>> the delay line and place clean new material on top.  Can you do this
> >>> with the Tonelab?  Since I couldn't figure out how to actually close
> >>> off
> >>> the input to the delay line, I couldn't really get that far anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the long winded post.  I guess I'm still looking for a
> >>> delay
> >>> with the modern bells and whistles and sound fidelity, but that feels
> >>> 'real'.  I'm beginning to run out of the current 'modelled' options
> >>> and
> >>> may just revert back to an analog delay and live with the noise and
> >>> limited features/delay time.  The Maxon AD-999 has piqued my
> >>> interest,
> >>> as well as the EH Deluxe Memory Man.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe I should have bought one of Bob Moog's delays a few years ago
> >>> when
> >>> I had the chance.  Hehe...
> >>>
> >>> Anybody have any direct experience with the EH Memory Man or the
> >>> Maxon?
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Rich
> >>> www.asopaque.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>