Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Unidentified subject!



For whatever reason, Gmail won't let me get the "Reply-To" blank, so
I'm forwarding this message back to the list.

I can't say whether the DD-20 or DD-6 would work. I suspect the DD-20
would, but I haven't been in the same room with one. Ted Killian is
practically an evangelist for the DD-20 (*not* a bad thing; he
answered all sorts of my questions about it and has me strongly
considering replacing my DL-4 with it). On paper, the DD-20 would
certainly do what you want, with a 23 second maximum.


On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:44:42 -0500, nato sp <natosp@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the response. I was wondering, what about the Boss DD-20
> Giga Delay? At $200 or so new, it's the cheapest thing I've found. Also, 
>do
> you think a Boss DD-6 could work? I think it has about 8 seconds of
> delay...Let me know. Thanks again.
> 
> nato
> 
> >From: Jon Southwood <jsouthwood@gmail.com>
> >Reply-To: Jon Southwood <jsouthwood@gmail.com>
> >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> >Subject: Re: Unidentified subject!
> >Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:26:13 -0600
> >
> >I'm not sure about the new model, but the original Akai Headrush had
> >the capability of recording up to 11.9 seconds while still allowing
> >overdubs or up to 23.8 seconds without allowing overdubs. The Headrush
> >was my first looper, and I loved it. The user interface is simple and
> >intuitive (or was to me). My wants quickly outgrew its capabilities,
> >though, and I moved on to an EDP (although at one point, I had the
> >Headrush, EDP, and Line 6 DL-4 all in the rig at the same time). The
> >original Headrush was going for a premium on ebay for a while (mine
> >actually sold for more than I paid for it originally), but now that
> >the 2nd version of it is available, I'd imagine they're going for less
> >these days.
> >
> >The Line 6 DL-4 would also work. It has a maximum of 14 seconds of
> >loop time (unless you record at half-speed, then you get 28 seconds at
> >half the sample rate). I think I read somewhere that these have been
> >discontinued, which is a shame. I'm not sure what they're going for on
> >ebay.
> >
> >Since it doesn't seem to matter to you whether or not you have the
> >capability of adjusting the feedback of the loop, you will not be
> >annoyed by the lack of that function in either the Headrush E1 or the
> >DL-4.
> >
> >Good luck,
> >
> >Jon Southwood
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:27:06 -0500, nato sp <natosp@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello all, I just subscribed to the list a moment ago to ask a 
>question.
> >I'd
> > > appreciate any answer(s) that I can get.
> > >
> > > I'm interested in a very simple and, if possible, inexpensive looping
> >pedal.
> > > I play guitar and sing in a band. Many times, my guitar parts are
> >complex
> > > and require all of my concentration. Therefore I can't play them 
>while I
> > > sing. Because of this, I'd like to have a pedal that can loop a riff 
>of
> >10
> > > seconds or less while I am playing live. I don't need or want any 
>other
> > > functions, I don't need to be able to overlay loops upon one another.
> > >
> > > Do my needs conjure up ideas about particular pedals? I've been 
>doing my
> > > best to read up on all the different options, from delays to loopers 
>to
> > > samplers etc. but am having trouble finding the right thing. Please
> >help!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > nato
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
>