Support |
I use a Fireworx to process the loops. The changing preset time is a little long but I have set a wet/dry fader on my switchblade to prevent the dropout. I think its filters are some of the most musical ones and I prefer them over the Orville's ones. I have never used it as a sequencer (I process loops live). If you can buy it cheap I would reccomend it as a post-processing tool ( very good compressor also). best, luca Per Boysen wrote: > On May 27, 2005, at 12:53, Sunao Inami wrote: > >> Hi Per, >> >> I am using Fireworx i, but I use only it for multi effector for mix >> or sound design... >> what is built in sequencer? (or my OS is very old?) > > > I don't know, I just read about the "simple built in sequencer" in > some online review. But fact is I managed to grab a Fireworx at > extremely cut down price at a music store sell out. So far I think > the vocoder is the most usable feature for live use. And the chord > harmonizer if playing monophonic instruments through the box. I'll > check it out more to see what the reviewer meant by "built in > sequencer". > > BTW, Sunao, many thanks for the disc I bought! I'm enjoying "an > impulse of acoustic" very much! > > Greetings from Sweden > > Per Boysen > www.looproom.com (international) > www.boysen.se (Swedish) > ---> iTunes Music Store (digital) > www.cdbaby.com/perboysen > > > > . >