Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Now I solved the "sequencer" question, it's a pre-set named so! And this pre-set sounds like a horrible synth sequence! Except for that I'm finding the Fireworx very useful, both for studio mixing and live looping performance. I guess it fits best before a looper so you can build music on-the-fly by looping your instrument through different Fireworx settings. With a flute you can get both a fat bass sound and cosmic pads, as well as some freaky lead sounds (vocoder, chord, whammy pedal). it's a good thing that you can patch so many controllers to different parameters. Have to check the vocoder more... per On May 28, 2005, at 0:03, Luca Formentini wrote: > I use a Fireworx to process the loops. > The changing preset time is a little long but I have set a wet/dry > fader on my switchblade to prevent the dropout. > I think its filters are some of the most musical ones and I prefer > them over the Orville's ones. > I have never used it as a sequencer (I process loops live). > If you can buy it cheap I would reccomend it as a post-processing > tool ( very good compressor also). > best, > luca > > Per Boysen wrote: > > >> On May 27, 2005, at 12:53, Sunao Inami wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Per, >>> >>> I am using Fireworx i, but I use only it for multi effector for >>> mix or sound design... >>> what is built in sequencer? (or my OS is very old?) >>> >> >> >> I don't know, I just read about the "simple built in sequencer" >> in some online review. But fact is I managed to grab a Fireworx >> at extremely cut down price at a music store sell out. So far I >> think the vocoder is the most usable feature for live use. And >> the chord harmonizer if playing monophonic instruments through >> the box. I'll check it out more to see what the reviewer meant by >> "built in sequencer". >> >> BTW, Sunao, many thanks for the disc I bought! I'm enjoying "an >> impulse of acoustic" very much! >> >> Greetings from Sweden >> >> Per Boysen