Support |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a patent a protection of an idea's implementation and not an idea? Like for instance I couldn't patent "car break" but I could patent a new technology I developed to break a car... So if the Repeater (or any Looper) implemented time stretching of audio USING someone else's circuit design and code, they'd be in trouble. However if they developed a new way of doing it, they're in the clear. I have to think it's got to be like this or how could Microsoft make Windows... or Apple make it's OS after looking at Zerox's computer GUI? You can't patent "clicking on an icon brings up a graphical representation of a window" but you can patent the code you use to implement it. Am I totally off here? Mark --- jeff larson <jeff.larson@sailpoint.com> wrote: > > From: Warren Sirota [mailto:wsirota@wsdesigns.com] > > Interesting. Can you give me any hints as to where > I might find the > patent > > info? > > Mr. Perille was kind enough to send me this URL: > > http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u > =%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=per > ille.IN.&OS=IN/perille&RS=IN/perille __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com