Support |
The popular mechanics 911 debunking page referenced by Dave: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html At 2008.08.03 12:46 PM, Dave wrote: >And thanks for that pilot's page, whoever sent that. Good stuff >there. I also looked at the pop mech debunking page. It looks to me >like they do a good job of avoiding the questions, put up pictures >that are contrary to the questions they're trying to answer, etc >(ie: the pic that "answers" the question regarding the puffs of >smoke that preceded the fall of the building. And they don't explain >how it fell at the speed of gravity.