Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
> I don't think the "pentagon plane" evaporated, either; I don't think >there > ever was a plane at the pentagon... Hmm...then what happened to Flight 77? I watched the whole video, still not buying it. I am suspicious of people who say gigantic conspiracies can be kept a secret for decades if not hundreds of years, when a secret like the atomic bomb couldn't be kept a secret from the Soviets for more than a few years. Especially if the people make a video with all kinds of bent facts, quick edits, sound bytes that are not identified, etc. I think the Popular Mechanics article was very well done and can't be just brushed off as not addressing the issues. In case people haven't looked at this page yet... http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/index.html WARNING, there are very graphic images on this page. But pieces of a jet engine are clearly visible. I don't have a problem with the idea that a large jet engine crashing into a wall of concrete at 300 mph would lose its structural integrity. :) It links to here: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html This whole conspiracy idea to me sounds too much like the idea that the moon landings were faked, which is ABSOLUTE GARBAGE. -- Mark Smart http://cdbaby.com/cd/marksmart http://www.marksmart.net