[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: @Bill, empty loop, or looperlative/EDP trick (composition?)
On Nov 13, 2010, at 11:25 PM, mark francombe wrote:
> Mybe not, but firstly i think its because replace is one of those
> techniques that pretty much shouts "i use a looper as an instrument,
> as opposed to a multi tracker. I believe these are the 2 main types of
> looping. And using replace is a bit of a statement. Your second point
> about a sequencer I think relates more to the nature of LIVE looping,
> and as such sequencers are a bit of a no no, not live us it???
Per picked up on this, but I should perhaps clarify that by sequencers I
meant the old traditional step sequencers. Turn the knobs and adjust the
adjust the note sequence. From an aural standpoint, it's pretty similar to
the replace effect. From a visual standpoint, maybe it is more fun
watching guitar players look at their feet, their fretboards, etc. -- I'm
guilty on that one -- though maybe a really big Tenori-On style instrument
would make for good audience eye-candy.
Mark
- References:
- Re: @Bill, empty loop, or looperlative trick
- From: William Walker <billwalker@baymoon.com>
- Re: @Bill, empty loop, or looperlative/EDP trick (composition?)
- From: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>
- Re: @Bill, empty loop, or looperlative/EDP trick (composition?)
- From: Sylvain Poitras <sylvain.trombone@gmail.com>
- Re: @Bill, empty loop, or looperlative/EDP trick (composition?)
- From: Mark Hamburg <mark@grubmah.com>
- Re: @Bill, empty loop, or looperlative/EDP trick (composition?)
- From: mark francombe <markfrancombe@gmail.com>