[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: The Big Bump issue.
Oh, I totally agree, don't get me wrong. I'd rather not work his way, but
I made
a choice, which was to give up some of the great functionality of the EDP,
in
return for Quad Loop recording (for under the $2400 you'd have to spend to
buy 4
EDPs) and non volatile memory. I also got a few extras, like great time
stretch/compress functions and the ability to shift loops against each
other.
Because I'm coming from the JamMan camp, I actually didn't loose anything.
I
never used the JamMan in delay mode (though I may now), because I needed
the
ability to change to a new loop, and go back. When I think of the use per
dollar
(I think I bought my JamMan new for $350 or so) of the JamMan, it's pretty
incredible.
Anyway, I've pretty much always "primed" my loops. I think I've learned
to work
this way and kind of "know" how long something needs to be. Maybe I'm
wrong. If
I had it the other way I might say, "how could I have done without this?"
Until
then, I'll be here in my apartment looping.
Mark Sottilaro
Kim Flint wrote:
> At 10:55 PM 9/12/2001, Mark Sottilaro wrote:
> >I'm not sure why you don't just record a blank loop first, at your
>desired
> >tempo/length and then, open it back up and start playing. I do it with
>big
> >pad-like volume swells all the time, and it works fine. No bump. This
>is the
> >only way you could do it on the JamMan as well. The EDP will finish a
> >loop and
> >keep you in record, I understand, but I'm not sure if anything else
>does.
>
> I believe this is accomplished in the jamman using the delay mode, right?
>
> The reason why pre-recording the loop first is unworkable for most people
> is because you want the loop length defined by what you are playing and
>not
> the other way around. If you are improvising, you probably don't really
> know how long the loop will before you start, and it can be rather
> difficult to play into a predefined loop length and get the timing right.
> You certainly don't want to sit there in front of your audience doing
> nothing while you wait for this empty loop to record! and this is not
>just
> about ambient sound washes either, as Mark L mentioned. All types of
> looping use this technique.
>
> Being able to overdub immediately after recording is a fundamental
>looping
> technique that has basically been in existence since the 60's. (or maybe
> earlier, I'm sure somebody can correct me.) Since the early/mid 90's
>we've
> been freed of having to preset loop lengths, with the arrival of devices
> like the Pardis Loop/Delay, the jamman, and the EDP where you could tap
>the
> loop lengths on the fly. Why should we be going backwards now?
>
> kim
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Kim Flint | Looper's Delight
> kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com