] [Thread Prev
Re: Looping with other musicians
>On Oct 13, 2004, at 7:50 AM, Travis Hartnett wrote:
>>Perhaps I missed it, but what exactly are you having problems with
>>regarding the EDP? Between the manual, the online FAQs and
>>knowledge base here, I think there's a ready answer to most
Larry Cooperman said:
>My problem is the free association and lack of organization of the
>thing. The language is secondary but it is a bit idiosyncratic of
>an artist which makes Kim more respectable to me but not while I'm
>reading the manual.
maybe your problem is not with Kim who wrote the manual but with me
who created most of the content. I prefered it to be intuitive rather
than logic. this was an amazing experience.
maybe the funcionality fits less to your focussed music, but you will
Daniel Erni http://danielerni.ch did some amazing compositions with
>I also understand, and I've known this for a long time, that the
>more canned the more dried of blood and guts.
your language is not easy to understand for me either :-)
also: "church lady"?
> That's my main area of inquiry into the whole looping thing. What
>is we're looking for as looping artists? I've used terms like
>masturbation and self aggrandizing and lumping myself into those
>descriptions when I consider looping but I am an adult and use
>language that may be a bit unnerving to those who are following some
>kind of holy writ of looping that may unconsciously exist.
big question, really. masturbation is a good thing. aggrandizing and
lumping also meet strong parts of the experience. Instant (soul/mood)
mirror is still the strongest and most holy for me.