Re: What are the looper features that manufacturers are stupid to leave out?

[Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:28 PM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> 
wrote:
> ...would you imagine a manufacturer dumb
> for not offering them?

Well, "dumb" could be an accurate description for some but maybe not
in all cases. I would most definitely say that it shows a flagrant
lack of market research!



On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Gareth Whittock
<buddhamachine@live.co.uk> wrote:
> I like the option of layers falling away under what I'm currently up to.

That's a cool thing I haven't thought of! I guess you mean a setting
by the preferences where you tell the looper to start deleting old
layers after a defined number. Very, very useful! Let me subscribe to
this idea! Imagine playing knowing that you will always be keeping
exactly four layers - that's powerful! A kind of extended version of
running an EDP at setting "Feedback = 0" (Where you are playing
against what you played in the previous round).

Greetings from Sweden

Per Boysen
www.perboysen.com
http://www.youtube.com/perboysen