Re: Upper word limit?

[mark francombe <mark@markfrancombe.com>]

Sounds facinating Ivodne!

The protocol is that anything goes unless Kim Flint says so. His decisions are always fair and always final and always expressed posthumously.

I suggest you try again.

Mark

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Ivodne Galatea <takas20@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hi, thanks for replying

No, it was in the body of text, but it was reasonably long. It is the first part of an expansion of an ontology of looping, expressed as a taxonomy of 140 lines after about 20 lines of introductory text. Should I try again in chunks? I don't want to flood in a first posting or anything. What is the protocol?

Thanks

> Subject: Re: Upper word limit?
> From: tedkillian@charter.net
> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:29:43 -0700
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com

>
> Hello back.
>
> Did you send this text within the body text of your email or as an "attachment."
>
> The LD list doesn't allow attachments of any kind (not graphic, not audio or video, not text).
>
> There is really no limit to how long an LD email post might be (as far as I know).
>
> But attachments never, never, ever work.
>
> Messages with them will likely be rejected by the server as spam.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ted Killian
>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Ivodne Galatea <takas20@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I've tried to send a bit of text I wrote on looping theory (twice) and it hasn't appeared. Is there an upper word limit? Or is there a heuristic that checks text for looking like spam or something?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>

--

Mark Francombe
www.markfrancombe.com
http://vimeo.com/user825094

http://electricityplant.wordpress.com/
twitter @markfrancombe