Support |
I don't think they will. It is too easy to make an idiosyncratic, uniquely specific one for yourself, one that will meet your own needs and surpass your expectations..... I'll be in Boise next weekend....c'mon....free max lessons..... [vst~] is so easy......... Off to LA now..... cheers, Jeff Jeff Kaiser http://www.JeffKaiser.com pfMENTUM.com • AngryVegan.com On Aug 20, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Krispen Hartung wrote: > Well, as usual, all roads lead back to MAX/MSP. :) It must be the > Rome of the effect processing world. > > Now, Jeff, if you could just get Cycling 74 to create a user friendly > (graphically pleasing and easy to use) interface, they will have me > sold. They don't have to provide maximum programming capability to > every user. Some of us just like to buy software and have it work > right out of the box. For instance, why don't they create a nice VST > host that is ready to go, but beats the pants off of others, like > Chainer, EnergyXT, Plogue, etc in terms of flexibility and power? > They could do this...it would capture a market that they don't have > now...sort of like Linux...I know a lot of Linux users who just say, > why don't you go to Linux, and all our MS OS problems will go > away...yeah right....I don't quite see the normal consumer user using > Linux with Red Hat yet. Programming may be fun and gratifying for some > folks, but not others. I don't want to build my own VST host in > MAX/MSP...I want them to do it for me, and make it look nice and easy > to use. They could probably do a survey of the current VST hosts out > there and come up with some great design ideas that improve upon them > all. You remember our conversation about this, Jeff..... > > Kris