Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: "Instrument" vs "Effect"


WTF?


>It's logical that Charles can't accept the effect to be an extension 
>of "the instrument" since he is one of the first guys alert on OT 
>mails ;-) ... All in one pack!
>
>The Playing Orchestra: http://www.telefonica.net/web2/tpo
>Chain Tape Collective: http://www.ct-collective.com
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Zwicky" 
><cazwicky@earthlink.net>
>To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
>Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 5:04 PM
>Subject: Re: "Instrument" vs "Effect"
>
>>These systems in their entirety are often referred to as an 
>>instrument, for instance Jimi Hendrix and his Marshalls, Jon Hassel 
>>and his harmonizer... I think this discussion got of on the wrong 
>>foot by claiming that an effect was an instrument. This may be 
>>correct, Electro Harmonix is of the philosophy that their 16 second 
>>delay and 2880 are 'looping instruments'.
>>--
>>...
>>http://www.zmix.net


-- 
...
http://www.zmix.net