Support |
Quoting Travis Hartnett <travishartnett@gmail.com>: > the music festival approach... I have done solo recitals and have played for conventions and festivals, too. My ego tends to prefer a solo recital however, as I look back, the performances I've delivered at festivals and conventions have been among my best. I am not sure why this is... perhaps there is a certain "energy" about festival events. As far as the 30 minute vs. 45 minute format -- well... IF I had to haul my entire PA system halfway across the country I could hardly justify a set under 45 minutes (though, 45 minutes is, I feel, an optimal amount of time for the material I play). If I need only haul my (minimal) stage equipment, then 30 minutes is OK. My music tends to be relatively concise -- my works typically range from five to ten minutes each. Thus, a 30-minute set would consist of three or four works. > And yeah, if I'm unfamiliar with an musician's work beforehand, my > attention is really going to start waning around 45 minutes unless > they're a stone cold genius. HaHa! I spose genius (like beauty) is in the eye of the beholder. Personally, I would rather play a shorter set and hold the listeners' attention than overstay my musical welcome. > But for all of you who enjoy it, by all means, carry on. :) -- Kevin