Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Very OT: Zeitgeist, The Movie... WAS... Semi-OT: Int'l Travellers' Laptops Confiscated...



Here is an interesting article written by people who demolish
buildings for a living:

http://www.implosionworld.com/news.htm#1


On 8/4/08, Dave <prog.music.freak@gmail.com> wrote:
> They are definitely there in several videos and recordings. And find the
> interviews of the firefighters who heard them and saw them, as well as
> explosions in the basements, that blew out the lobby's windows prior to 
>the
> collapses...
>
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Mark Smart <marksmartus@gmail.com> 
>wrote:
>
>> One of the many problems with the controlled demolition
>> hypothesis...in every video I've ever seen of a controlled demolition
>> of a building, there is a series of extremely loud and usually visible
>> explosions preceding the collapse....BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG...I
>> don't see or hear this in the WTC collapse videos.
>>
>> On 8/3/08, Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have an alternative theory to present:
>> >
>> > In 1993 an attempt was made to tip over the WTC building via a truck
>> > bomb in the corner of the parking garage.
>> >
>> > This attack was primitive and ineffective largely because the bombers
>> > were ignorant of the building's design.
>> >
>> > The "powers that be" were suddenly faced with the real possibility
>> > that there may be a situation where the buildings could become
>> > unstable if they were damaged due to fire or bombing or whatever and
>> > cause unspeakable collateral damage to lower Manhattan.
>> >
>> > The buildings were therefor prewired for controlled demolition
>> > sometime over the following 18 years and the decision was made to
>> > implode them after the planes hit in September 2001.
>> >
>> > The "official" explanation (i.e. jet fuel caused the colapse) is
>> > preposterous, as is the attept to blame the collase of WTC #7 on
>> > "raging fires".
>> >
>> > -Chuck Zwicky
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>  > They're talking seriously and from an engineer's POV about such
>> >>>  apparent facts as that not a single steel-frame skyscraper in 
>history
>> >>>  has ever collapsed due to fire, even though many have burned much
>> >>>  hotter than the Twin Towers did, or could have if it was only a 
>jet-
>> >>>  fuel fire.
>> >>
>> >>I was not aware of this. Where can I find information about these
>> >>other skyscraper fires with no collapse? Were the fires as large as
>> >>the ones at the WTC?
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>Mark Smart
>> >>http://cdbaby.com/cd/marksmart
>> >>http://www.marksmart.net
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ...
>> > http://www.zmix.net
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Smart
>> http://cdbaby.com/cd/marksmart
>> http://www.marksmart.net
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "The Universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent to the
> concerns of such creatures as we." - Carl Sagan, from "Cosmos"
>


-- 
Mark Smart
http://cdbaby.com/cd/marksmart
http://www.marksmart.net